WASHINGTON — A government judge changed an apparently clear condemning hearing for Michael T. Flynn, President Trump’s first national security counsel, into a sensational confrontation on Tuesday, communicating “appall” at Mr. Flynn’s endeavors to delude government examiners and rejecting proposals he had been dealt with unreasonably.

In a phenomenal two-hour session in Federal District Court in Washington, the judge, Emmet G. Sullivan, left presumably that he saw Mr. Flynn’s violations as sufficiently genuine to warrant jail time in spite of a suggestion from investigators that he get a tolerant sentence.

In any case, Judge Sullivan gave Mr. Flynn the choice of putting off his condemning so he had extra time to demonstrate the estimation of his collaboration with government examiners. Mr. Flynn quickly took up the offer, postponing a choice on his destiny in any event until March.

The meeting underscored the gravity of the request by the uncommon guidance, Robert S. Mueller III, and the tremendous ramifications for those trapped in it.

Mr. Flynn, 59, a resigned three-star general whose military profession crossed 33 years, conceded a year prior to misleading F.B.I. specialists about his discussions with the Russian envoy, Sergey I. Kislyak, in the month after Mr. Trump’s decision. He additionally recognized that he lied in records he documented with the Justice Department about his campaigning endeavors for the Turkish government before the decision.

“This is an intense offense,” Judge Sullivan said. “A high-positioning senior authority of the administration putting forth false expressions to the Federal Bureau of Investigation while on the physical premises of the White House.”

At a certain point, Judge Sullivan asked whether Mr. Flynn could have been accused of extra wrongdoings. Afterward, he even raised and afterward dropped the possibility of a case for conspiracy.

The judge additionally strolled back another provocative proclamation he had made, saying he “felt horrible” that he had wrongly charged Mr. Flynn prior in the procedure of moving out his nation by at the same time functioning as a remote specialist for Turkey and Mr. Trump’s national security counselor. Mr. Flynn’s work for Turkey finished before he took up his White House post.

Despite the fact that examiners had said they would acknowledge a sentence of probation, the judge cautioned Mr. Flynn that he couldn’t ensure that result. Warning condemning rules suggest a greatest sentence of a half year in jail.

“I can’t make any certifications, yet I’m not concealing my sicken, my hate for this criminal offense,” the judge said.

Prior to Tuesday’s hearing, Mr. Flynn and his legal advisor, Robert K. Kelner, had suggested in presentencing updates that the F.B.I. specialists who had talked with Mr. Flynn may have deceived him by neglecting to caution him that misleading agents was a wrongdoing.

In raising the likelihood of wrongdoing by the examiners, Mr. Flynn and his supporters further powered endeavors by Mr. Trump and a portion of his supporters to undermine the believability of the exceptional insight’s examination.

However, under addressing by Judge Sullivan, Mr. Flynn recognized that he realized it was a wrongdoing to mislead the F.B.I. also, he repeated his blame.

The presentencing update from Mr. Flynn’s barrier group had noticed that F.B.I. specialists had purposely chosen not to caution Mr. Flynn that deceiving them was a criminal offense when they talked with him in the West Wing on Jan. 24, 2017, four days after Mr. Trump’s initiation.

The specialists additionally told Mr. Flynn that advising the White House Counsel’s Office would be tedious and incite the Justice Department’s contribution.

That commenced an open contention about the F.B.I’s. direct, with Mr. Trump demanding the law-requirement experts had wrongly cornered Mr. Flynn. It likewise motivated hypothesis that Mr. Flynn, whose legal advisor at one point talked about a conceivable acquit with a legal counselor for Mr. Trump, was welcoming the president to save him discipline.

Prior to the conference, Mr. Trump wished Mr. Flynn “good fortunes,” saying he had been under “colossal weight.”

Indeed, even after it, Sarah Huckabee Saunders, the White House squeeze secretary, said Mr. Flynn had been wronged. “What we do know,” she stated, “is that the F.B.I. broke standard convention such that they came in and trapped General Flynn and in the manner in which that they addressed him and in the manner in which that they urged him not to have White House Counsel’s Office present.”

Yet, in Judge Sullivan’s fourth-floor court, Mr. Kelner said he was only attempting to demonstrate that Mr. Flynn had been held to a higher standard than two other individuals who had conceded to deceiving government examiners for the exceptional advice: George Papadopoulos, a previous Trump crusade helper, and Alex van der Zwaan, a Dutch legal advisor who worked with Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s previous battle administrator. The two men were cautioned ahead of time not to deceive examiners and one conveyed a legal advisor to his F.B.I. meet.

The judge rapidly rejected that examination, over and again taking note of that Mr. Flynn was a high-positioning government official who had sold out the administration’s trust by lying “in the White House, in the West Wing.”

Despite the fact that Judge Sullivan has a notoriety for being difficult for government wrongdoing, he found no blame with the direct of the F.B.I. or on the other hand examiners. He said Mr. Flynn misled not just F.B.I. operators, yet in addition senior White House authorities, who at that point rehashed his deceives the American open.

“This is an intense offense,” he said. “This case is in a classification without anyone else.”

At a certain point, he asked Brandon L. Van Grack, the lead examiner, regardless of whether Mr. Flynn was blameworthy of injustice. The inquiry obviously astonished a phalanx of attorneys on Mr. Mueller’s group who were available for the procedures. Mr. Van Grack at first wavered to reply, at that point later said the legislature had no proof of injustice, and the judge dropped the point.

Some of Judge Sullivan’s most honed censures included Mr. Flynn’s lies about his campaigning work for the Turkish government. Wrongly attesting that Mr. Flynn kept on filling in as an unregistered outside specialist amid his short residency as national security counselor, the judge motioned to the American banner next to him and proclaimed: “I mean, ostensibly, that undermines everything this banner here represents. Seemingly, you sold your nation out.”

For Mr. Flynn, who once driven supporters of Mr. Trump’s battle in serenades of “bolt her up” against Hillary Clinton, more vulnerability lies ahead. In spite of the fact that investigators said they had gathered everything they could from him, Mr. Kelner told the judge that Mr. Flynn needed to put off his condemning to place himself in the best position “to squeeze out the last small amount of collaboration.”

Under his supplication bargain, Mr. Flynn met with agents and investigators for the exceptional insight’s office multiple times. In doing as such, he turned into an early cooperator in an examination that has spun off criminal cases now in the hands of other government investigators.

The extraordinary insight’s office is researching whether Mr. Trump impeded equity, including by asking James B. Comey, the F.B.I. chief at the time, to end the examination concerning Mr. Flynn in mid 2017. It is misty whether Mr. Flynn thought about the president’s accounted for endeavor to mediate for his sake, or whether he has offered any bits of knowledge on that front.

Investigators recognized that Mr. Flynn had helped the administration secure a prosecution in Northern Virginia against two of his previous business partners for disregarding remote campaigning rules. Investigators said the two men planned with Turkey in 2016 to weight the United States to oust an opponent of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

In spite of the fact that he could have dealt with extra indictments all things considered that conveyed up to 15 years in jail, examiners stated, Mr. Flynn was being dealt with just as an observer.

How precisely Mr. Flynn’s untruths hampered the uncommon guidance’s investigation into Russia’s intruding in the 2016 race stayed, until further notice, vague. So did the exact reasons he lied.

Judge Sullivan expressly cautioned Mr. Flynn that regardless of whether he could indicate additional proof of the amount he had helped the unique advice’s office and the Justice Department, he may even now sentence him to jail.

As Mr. Flynn left the government courthouse, he confronted an isolated and rambunctious group in which a few people hollered “U.S.A.” while others recited “Bolt him up.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.